Prasangika

Even non-Buddhists can have valid apprehension of voidness, but not non-conceptional cognition, and thus cannot achieve a true stopping of suffering.

Svatantrika and Prasangika are two divisions of the Madhyamaka tenet system, but according to the Gelugpa presentation, Svatantrika asserts self-established (inherent) existence, while Prasangika refutes it.

There are two major sets of mental obscurations: emotional obscurations and cognitive obscurations.

A seminar on what karma actually means in terms of Vasubandhu and Nagarjuna’s presentations.

The non-conceptual understanding of voidness will stop the tainted aggregates from uncontrollably recurring. 

A question-and-answer session between Dr. Alexander Berzin and Tsenshap Serkong Rinpoche II on the Prasangika view of voidness according to the Gelugpa and Nyingma assertions.

Liberated beings (arhats) have attained a true stopping of all the emotional obscurations, but their mental continuums still contain the cognitive obscurations.

A detailed analysis of how to understand the networks of “pure-builder positive force” and “pure-builder deep awareness.”

A comparison of the Vaibhashika, Chittamatra and Prasangika presentations of tainted phenomena, which perpetuate samsara, and untainted ones, which do not extend it.

An overview of terminologies used when describing everything left on someone’s mental continuum as a consequence of having committed a karmic action.