Vaibhashika and Sautrantika: The Self

Introduction 

When we look at the concept of the self in Buddhism, we need to analyze it from the points of view of the four schools of the Indian tenet systems. We’re going to refine our understanding further and further as we work our way through these schools. When we speak about the self, the word self here is going to be used as a synonym for a person and “me.” When I look in the mirror and I see myself, I see “me,” I see a person; it’s all referring to the same thing. We’re not talking about ego; we’re not talking about any of these psychological things; we’re just talking about the conventional “me.”

In order to understand the self, like any other thing in Buddhism, we have to exclude what it’s not. That’s the only way that we can identify things; it’s what’s left over after we exclude what it’s not. That’s how a doctor diagnoses a sickness; something has been excluded; it’s not this and it’s not that. That way, we can conclude what it is. 

All four tenet systems assert in common that we lack a coarse impossible self or soul. In other words, the type of soul or atman that’s asserted by the non-Buddhist Indian systems; this is impossible. There’s no such thing; we don’t exist like that. We don’t exist as this type of soul, this type of atman. That’s not “me.” Okay? 

Top